Tuesday, November 29, 2011

An Essay From Robert Reich


Restore the Basic Bargain


MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2011
For most of the last century, the basic bargain at the heart of the American economy was that employers paid their workers enough to buy what American employers were selling.
That basic bargain created a virtuous cycle of higher living standards, more jobs, and better wages.
Back in 1914, Henry Ford announced he was paying workers on his Model T assembly line $5 a day – three times what the typical factory employee earned at the time. The Wall Street Journal termed his action “an economic crime.”
But Ford knew it was a cunning business move. The higher wage turned Ford’s auto workers into customers who could afford to buy Model T’s. In two years Ford’s profits more than doubled.
That was then. Now, Ford Motor Company is paying its new hires half what it paid new employees a few years ago.
The basic bargain is over – not only at Ford but all over the American economy.
New data from the Commerce Department shows employee pay is now down to the smallest share of the economy since the government began collecting wage and salary data in 1929.
Meanwhile, corporate profits now constitute the largest share of the economy since 1929.
1929, by the way, was the year of the Great Crash that ushered in the Great Depression.
In the years leading up to the Great Crash, most employers forgot Henry Ford’s example. The wages of most American workers remained stagnant. The gains of economic growth went mainly into corporate profits and into the pockets of the very rich. American families maintained their standard of living by going deeper into debt. In 1929 the debt bubble popped.
Sound familiar? It should. The same thing happened in the years leading up to the crash of 2008.
The latest data on corporate profits and wages show we haven’t learned the essential lesson of the two big economic crashes of the last seventy-five years: When the economy becomes too lopsided – disproportionately benefitting corporate owners and top executives rather than average workers – it tips over.
In other words, we’re in trouble because the basic bargain has been broken.
Yet incredibly, some politicians think the best way to restart the nation’s job engine is to make corporations even more profitable and the rich even richer – reducing corporate taxes; cutting back on regulations protecting public health, worker safety, the environment, and small investors; and slashing taxes on the very rich.
These same politicians think average workers should have even less money in their pockets. They don’t want to extend the payroll tax cut or unemployment benefits. And they want to make it harder for workers to form unions.
These politicians have reality upside down.
Corporations don’t need more money. They have so much money right now they don’t even know what to do with all of it. They’re even buying back their own shares of stock. This is a bonanza for CEOs whose pay is tied to stock prices and it increases the wealth of other shareholders. But it doesn’t create a single new job and it doesn’t raise the wages of a single employee.
Nor do the wealthiest Americans need more money. The top 1 percent is already taking in more than 20 percent of total income — the highest since the 1920s.
American businesses, including small-business owners, have no incentive to create new jobs because consumers (whose spending accounts for about 70 percent of the American economy) aren’t spending enough. Consumers’ after-tax incomes dropped in the second and third quarters of the year, the first back-to-back drops since 2009.
The recent small pickup in consumer spending has come out of their savings. Obviously this can’t continue, and corporations know it. Consumer savings are already at their lowest level in four years.
Get it? Corporate profits are up right now largely because pay is down and companies aren’t hiring. But this is a losing game even for corporations over the long term. Without enough American consumers, their profitable days are numbered.
After all, there’s a limit to how much profit they can get out of cutting American payrolls or even selling abroad. European consumers are in no mood to buy. And most Asian economies, including China, are slowing.
We’re in a vicious cycle. The only way out of it is to put more money into the pockets of average Americans. That means extending the payroll tax cut. And extending unemployment benefits.
Don’t stop there. Create a WPA to get the long-term unemployed back to work. And a Civilian Conservation Corp to create jobs for young people.
Hire teachers for classrooms now overcrowded, and pay them enough to attract people who are talented as well as dedicated. Rebuild our pot-holed highways. Create a world-class infrastructure.
Pay for this by hiking taxes on millionaires.
A basic bargain was once at the heart of the American economy. It recognized that average workers are also consumers and that their paychecks keep the economy going.
We can’t have a healthy economy until that bargain is restored.

Friday, November 25, 2011

Invest a Little Time

OK, all you right-wingers. This should envelope you from both sides, but will require a little work.

First, watch the decidedly left-wing video, and try not to implode. It's mostly about America, but lots of it apply here too. Let's discuss the meat, not the sizzle.

Next, read the book "Endgame: The End of the Debt Supercycle and How It Changes Everything".

I have to admit, I haven't read much more than the introduction to the book - just downloaded it.

These both should be good fodder for conversation.....

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Occupy That!

Globe and Mail

I've received plenty of feedback on my Occupy This! post, both informally and through comments on the post itself.

As I watched the news this morning, I also saw the Premier (carpetbagger that she is) say "I'm fed up" and "it's time to end this nonsense".

These homeless, unemployed, drug-addicted, social outcasts have worn out their welcome. They also have the misunderstanding that they can change the world and (mostly because we told them) that getting an education is the key to upward mobility.

I have noticed, however, that these opinions all come from people who have already "made it".

So from someone who's "made it", here are two specific suggestions to the Occupy movement to really have an impact.
  • Pick a multinational oil company and boycott that company. Make it cool not to do business with Shell, or Esso, or Chevron - in the USA I'd pick Exxon.
  • Move your money out of one of the big banks in Canada, and move it to a local Credit Union. There's already an ap for that! 
With these two actions, if enough people did them, you'd have an irritating, perfectly legal way of impacting two of the largest, most corrupt, most influential sectors we have - energy and banking. Simple and easily understood.

Actually, in order to have an impact, it's the over 40 crowd that will have to do this. The "Occupiers" probably ride bikes and take transit, and they certainly have no money.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Career Counselling

With winter settling in to it's wet & cold phase for the next several months, and with me pretty much stuck here in Vancouver for the duration (maybe?), it's time to turn my thoughts to using my brain again and doing something that's both challenging and flexible. Earning some cash isn't a bad idea either.

I've started another blog with the intent of commercializing it - but first you've got to get traffic, and the only way get that is with content. I think I'm up for the content creation part of this, but could use some help with some anecdotal stories from any of you reading this - have a look at the blog and you'll know what kind of stories I'd like (maybe a little Q&A is in order as well).

I was somewhat hesitant to jump in this with both feet, not knowing if this was a reasonable idea or not - it was for me, but I hadn't really talked to anyone about it. So yesterday, I had a conversation with John (Alpha), and bounced the ideas off him. He had many suggestions, but on the whole thought that the thinking was clear and the objective was obtainable (traffic and some money). We had dinner last night with another tech/personal friend, and we're going to schedule a lunch in the next week or two to discuss in detail.

John mentioned another idea that I've pondered, but never very seriously - contract technical writing. I don't know if I'd be any good at it (I suspect that I might, though), but he did say that there's a demand for these kinds of people in the Vancouver area and that often it's a career driven by a lifestyle choice - which would describe me perfectly. We'll see how this pans out as I think about it longer. Years ago Dave K said that his ideal job wouldn't be one job, but seven or eight small ones (I doubt he remembers this, but I do). I think that's about as good as you can get, provided that it's not overwhelming.

So back to the blog ... have a read and tell me (honestly) what you think. It's a work in process, so it's not that pretty. The idea is to get content first, traffic second and monitization last.....

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Occupy this!

Jeff Vinnick for the Globe and Mail
I've had plenty of time now to come to some understanding of the "Occupy XXX (fill in name of city here)" demonstrations over the last several weeks.

At first, although I sympathized with the demonstrators, they didn't have a single, cohesive theme to grab me with. Something I could latch on to. Kind of like the Tea Party. Although they (the Tea Party) had a simplistic, easy-to-understand, uninformed theme - at least it stuck. Seems that the right wing in the USA has a distinct advantage of being able to stay on message.

But the more I listened and read, the clearer it became to me. There isn't a clear message because there can't be one. We're past the days of 'easy solutions for easy problems'. There is no single thing - or even several things - we could do to meet their needs.

What I think they're calling for - and this is just my interpretation - is an entire restructuring of the way we do things. The system we have now is 'winner take all'. There is no long term view - either in the business world or in our individual lives. The rules have been rigged to support this idea. Here are several examples of what I'm thinking of:
  • Corporations have person-hood.  Corporations have all the privileges of being a person, with very few of the responsibilities. And none of the downside. Being beholden to shareholders first, second and third is lunacy. And most every corporation that says their employees, customers, or social responsibility is high on their list - is lying to you. Shareholders trump all.
  • Young adults today have a much reduced chance of finding real, rewarding work. Unemployment is very high, and the 'under-employed' is a huge class (across all age groups).
  • We've been fed the 'you must go to University to get a good job' line for decades now. Today we know that's foolish and stupid.
  • We export everything we can export - jobs, water, oil - without regard for the repercussions (like huge unemployment). We reward the people who do the exporting. 
  • People who add no value are rewarded excessively (banking).
  • People who add huge value are not rewarded at all (teachers, cops, firemen, social workers).
  • We have lived way beyond our means in the West for decades. Now it's coming home to roost.
  • We're very quick to promote democracy when it suits us (Egypt, Libya), but not so quick when it doesn't (Greece, Occupy XXX).


When I see in the news today that the City of Vancouver is trying to shut down the Occupy site downtown, I can't help but think that 'if you want to really inflame the situation and bolster the movement, that's how to do it'.  They're inconveniencing nobody. The cries of 'but someone died there' are hollow - go to the Downtown East Side and see how many die there every week. But we never see or hear about those deaths. The site is at most an eyesore for those who live by the Art Gallery (nobody). It's a shame that all the people working in downtown Vancouver might have to look at the site for a few minutes a day. And a shame that they had to re-route the Santa Clause Parade - hardship, I know.

So that's my rant of the moment - I'd like to hear from anyone who's over the age of 30 and agrees (or disagrees) with me!

Monday, November 7, 2011

Sadly, the redneck antenna is going...

This morning, Laura took it upon herself to phone Shaw Cable and change our lineup - again. As of tomorrow, Doug's redneck antenna experiment will end, and corporate greed and consumer hand-feeding will return - it's part of the bargain when you sign up for cable.

So, in this household anyways, Internet-only + over-the-air television doesn't cut it yet. I think that I could be quite content with this setup, but I'm apparently only one vote. When Laura went to sign up again, she did get the cost down, so it won't be quite the financial hit that it was last time.

Perhaps if I could just get a US-based IP address, then we could use Hulu or Google TV? Hmmm.....

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

The debacle...

In mid-August I did something that I've heard lots about, but knew no-one who had actually done it. I cut the cable TV. Completely. Zero. Zilch. Nada. In order to somewhat compensate, I beefed up the Internet access to higher upload and download speeds, as well as an increase in the monthly data cap.

This has now transformed into a full out family brawl, to which I've become particularly obstinate. You see, David returned from Korea this last weekend, and wants to get his hockey fix. Laura wants the fix too. After the tremendously fulfilling Canucks season last year (if you don't read the sarcasm, let me assure you that it's there), I have no doubt why.

I figured that with my redneck antenna, you could get CBC quite well, and you can. I didn't know that CBC doesn't carry all of the games, for that you'd need SportsNet. SportsNet isn't available over-the-air. Hence the argument.

Both Laura and Dave have offered to pay for all or most of the cable required to get hockey on for this season. Problem is that I think Laura's cash could be better spent (she is the only breadwinner in the household right now), and Dave is a starving artist that can better use his funds. And I'm pulling the "I'm an asshole" card and saying "no" regardless.

My argument is that, other than some hockey (non-CBC) there isn't anything worth watching that we can't find some other way - be it over-the-air, Netflix, or downloaded. Hockey is the casualty. Since I'm no hockey fan, it doesn't bother me at all. But I do understand that the other members of the family (note that both Kathryn and David are only here for a few short weeks, and Kath could care less) love it. I can't say I love (or even like) the "hockey shrapnel" left in the house during and after a game. The yelling at the TV confuses me.

So am I being a "ruthless redneck" or just "ahead of the curve"?

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

My response to Bruce's reply...

My friend Bruce sent a compelling message to me in response to one of my previous posts about packing too much stuff.

I've considered my position again, and am sure that I can compensate for Bruce's earth-killing-carbon-footprint when he travels. Among the things I will consider in the future are:


  • Travelling naked where allowed.
  • Sleeping under a borrowed tarp - there is no need to bring your own. Everybody owns a tarp.
  • A homeless dog makes a useful pillow. A dead homeless dog won't move and wake you up.
  • Did you know that most restaurants throw out meals that haven't been completely eaten? Bonus.
  • The police can chauffeur you most anywhere if you act up in public. Every sixty days or so, do something really outrageous, and you can get a free haircut (not to mention meals) when you are in prison.
  • Movies are free if you watch them through somebody's window.
  • If you borrow a knife, you can carve shoes out of abandoned tires. Radial tires work best. Attach them to your feet using tree sap (also free).
  • Instead of a digital camera, just draw pictures in the sand or dirt. They are as available as most people's digital photos anyways.
  • Did you know that they have these places that let you have books, and expect you to bring them back in a few weeks. Fools.
  • If you need to learn how to wash in a public restroom (if you care about that sort of thing), ask for tips at the local Chevron station. As an added bonus, the odor of gasoline is an effective deodorant.

These tips are important for any enlightened traveler. Let the Bruce's of the world destroy the planet - I'll try to save it!

Home Sweet Home

Going to Sydney on a ship was a lengthy process. Sixteen sea-days and six time zones (plus crossing the International Date Line which was actually pretty uneventful - go to bed on Friday night, and wake up on Sunday morning).

Getting home from Australia was a short matter of a fourteen hour flight. But I'm sure the jet-lag will make it a multiple day affair to recoup (although right now I feel pretty good - even slept through the night until 6:30am).

Home is much, much cooler than where we came from - we're entering fall while Oz is well into spring - and spring in Sydney means 30C.

Now that I've had a taste of "down under", I will have to re-evaluate the places I want to go in the next few years. Europe is always attractive, but sometimes I'm convinced that the tourists outnumber the locals. South America really sounds interesting, but maybe it's a bit too "rustic" for me right now.

Oz is probably a place I want to go back to, and spend some significant time. Outside the cities. Circumnavigate the country in a "caravan". You can get a six month tourist visa really easy. Wanna come?

Goodbye Sydney

If this isn't an iconic city, then I don't know what iconic means.

Sydney, on our last couple of days in town, was spectacular ... moderate, warm weather together with spectacular views taken from a State Park located across from the Opera House.

Not much to say after that.....

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Bruce's reply...

This was so funny I had to post it...

On Thursday, October 20, 2011, Bruce Chambers wrote: 
Doug,
It sounds like the trip is going well (despite the rain in Cairns) by the descriptions in your blog. I just read the latest installments to Sandra while we are having our morning coffee. In particular the entry entitled Smaller is Better. She had two responses to your write up on what you have and what you need for a lengthy trip such as this:
1. "He must smell real nice" ..... I get the feeling she was being sarcastic.
2. "It's some kind of sickness".
While I can't vouch for your personal hygiene or your apparent inability to carry more than five pounds in your luggage I have to say that we differ in our modes of travel and what we think we require for said travel.
I, personally, can carry 200 pounds in a back pack or 350 pounds in a suitcase with wheels. And this is why I like to take any items with me that there may be the remotest chance, a glimmer so to speak, of being required and of being put to use. For our recent trip to Italy, the cruise and Turkey I took the following. (The list is not inclusive).
  • Pants (not zip offs .... only a dork would ..... oh,never mind .....,
  • Shorts, lots.
  • At least two bathing suits. Putting on a damp bathing suit from the previous day just will not work!
  • Shirts (long sleeve, short sleeve collared, short sleeve collarless, various colours and fabrics)
  • Hiking /walking sandals
  • Shoes, casual and dress
  • Boots, casual and dress
  • Pool sandals
  • Light jacket
  • Wind breaker
  • Rain jacket (packable to save space)
  • Ski jacket (in case of freak snow storm .... it could happen),
  • Portable BBQ in case of food cooking emergency.
  • Some smoked meats in case of a lack of food emergency. Smoked meats travel well and don't need a lot of refrigeration.
  • Hockey stick to show the 'natives' real Canadian culture.
  • Three books - in case two are crappy, third time lucky. And they should be hardcover as they travel better.
  • Norwegian hiking sticks  ... to be used in the off chance I succumb and buy zip off pants.
  • Starbucks VIA coffee.
  • Folding chair in case I need to sit down.
  • Enough hand wipes to have an entire sponge bath (for two) in case of a lack of shower emergency.
  • Spare automotive 12 volt battery. You certainly wouldn't want your taxi to fail to start if you were rushing out to an evening of washing your clothes at a laundromat. (This is just a suggestion for you as I would have enough clothes packed to last the entire trip+ and never have to wash any.)
  • Screwdrivers (flathead, Robertson and Phillips, a crescent wrench and a pair of pliers.)
  • Every AAA map in print.
  • Other assorted necessities.

Friday, October 21, 2011

The sea was angry that day my friends....

It has been the wettest October in 43 years in Cairns. That's because Laura and I are visiting.

We had hoped by postponing our trip to the Great Barrier Reef till the last day we were to be in Cairns, the weather might improve. It didn't. 

The Quicksilver catamaran left the dock in Port Douglas at 10am precisely (if there's one thing these Aussies are - it's on time!). We had been warned that their 1 hour 30 minute crossing of the Coral Sea to their floating pontoon location on the outermost reef would be "rough". They were handing out ginger tablets (and, for those that ginger didn't work, some narcotic) for sea sickness. Even though I took two ginger before we left, Laura said I looked "a little green" by the time we arrived.

As soon as we tied up beside the pontoon, we headed over to their partially submersible submarine/boat to take a half hour tour of the reef - it's sort of a glass bottom boat, except the sides are underwater and you sit at windows looking at all the fishies. The tour was really quite good, and showed you what you could expect when snorkeling, without getting wet. Alas, the boat itself was quite claustrophobic, hot and bouncy (because of the choppy sea), so it didn't help my green-ness.

We got back onto the platform and Laura donned a rented Lycra suit for her first dip into the Coral Sea/Great Barrier Reef. They rent the suits, I imagine, because they can capitalize on a little "fear-uncertainty-doubt" with the passengers - they told us that nomally the jellyfish don't arrive until November, but because the water was especially warm, they were early. And a jellyfish sting is not something you want to experience. So we rented a couple of suits.

Laura enjoyed frolicking in the sea, despite the swell and the waves, and after she came out for some lunch, I decided that I better have a go of it as well. Donning the same (type, not actually the same) lycra, and attaching an XXXL lifevest, I went in the water for a half hour or so. I was worried the whole time that the waves would swamp the snorkle, but they didn't.

Overall, it was a fantastic, though expensive, day. We were picked up at 8:10am and dropped off at 6:30pm completely exhausted. Highly recommended.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Wet, wet Cairns

We arrived in Cairns on Tuesday morning (Monday for those in N.America) and it hasn't stopped raining since. They have received over 500mm of rain in the last 48 hours, with no end in sight. The rain here isn't the gentle stuff you get in Vancouver, it's the "oh my god run for shelter" type that soaks you in about three seconds. Think of a garden hose.

Regardless of the weather, though, we figure this may be a once in a lifetime adventure (hope not) so the advantage is that all the tourist spots are empty. We took the Skyrail to Kuranda and managed to stay more-or-less dry, but we had the place pretty much to ourselves. Tomorrow (Friday) we take Quicksilver to the Great Barrier Reef, and I expect much the same.

It's nice to know that even though it's really wet, it's also really warm. So imagine that garden hose with warm bath water. You are wet, but you're not cold. We still hope for some sunshine before heading back to Sydney for a couple of days, and then the long flight home to cold and damp...

Smaller is better...

I can't believe I'm saying this ... "I brought too much stuff with me". Although I did this 40-day trip with a 25l backpack, and Laura tires of seeing me in the same clothes, I brought stuff I could do without:

  • I only need one pair of pants - I have a pair of zip-off's that do nicely. they even look presentable.
  • I need one pair of shorts. For when I'm not wearing the pants.
  • I need a pair of swim-trunks. These also double as pajamas.
  • I need a pair of good looking sandals that look presentable in a dining room, but you can also wear to the beach. Boat shoes might works well too.
  • I would leave the socks at home.
  • I would leave the second pair of shoes at home. They take up too much room in the pack.
  • I need a waterproof jacket that comes down far enough to cover the wallet in my pants/shorts.
  • I'd add a small, compressible, light backpack for running around town - put the camera, passports, and jacket in it (like those shopping bags you can carry on your keychain, only with some shoulder straps).

My biggest problem, I know, is the amount of tech I carry with me - it takes up almost half the bag. One laptop with power adapter. One Kindle. One iTouch. One camera. The shaving kit takes up some room too, but it's hard to imagine ever trimming that down more than has already happened. Next time....

Cairns or bust

When we sailed to Hawaii from Vancouver, we met Peter and Marion by chance on a tender from the ship to the island of Maui. Laura struck up a conversation with Marion on the trip over, and we subsequently met back at the ship for drinks. They were from Sydney, and answered lots of our questions about what to see in our short time in Australia. They departed for their home after the Hawaii leg, but not before inviting us for dinner once we landed in Oz.

Dinner was last night, and it couldn't have been more wonderful. These were folks we'd met for a sum total of about an hour, spread over a few days on a ship. Turns out that we had much in common, and we were disappointed when the clock struck 11:30pm and it was time to catch a cab back to our hotel - we still had to pack for the flight to Cairns this morning. The dinner they fixed was spectacular - salmon, flat fish (an Aussie favorite), lamb, steak and two salads - followed by dessert and coffee - followed again by a selection of Australian chocolate bars that were strange to us, but turned out to be mostly small variations of North American favorites (O-Henry, Caramilk, and Mars Bars come to mind). We've had chance meetings that turned into a dinner invite before - with mixed results - but this was really a great evening.

This morning we were up and out of the hotel (or is it a hostel - hard to tell) with two backpacks and Laura's gigantic bag (which is slowly dissolving - it is now adorned by several strips of duct tape, and one wheel is held on by chewing gum and spit). We checked the huge bag into long term luggage storage at the Sydney Airport, and we'll collect it when we're back from Cairns. I've convinced Laura to downsize into her backpack for this short four day stint north to see the Great Barrier Reef, and once she was unencumbered she will admit that light and carry-on is the way to go.

So it's off to Cairns we go - a three hour flight from Sydney. I have no idea what to expect, except that the wallet will take further shrapnel from the Australian economy (it's expensive here!). What the heck, when in Rome....