Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Deception Pass

I have no excuse for not writing since May 3rd, except that I've been incredibly busy for an unemployed guy. I've started a program (TKA) that has me writing 6-10 three hundred word articles a day. It doesn't seem like much until you recognize that often, all of the articles are about exactly the same thing. Chews up a few hours a day anyways, and I'm finding that my typing speed and accuracy are getting much better (almost, but not quite, where it was).

But that's not the reason for this post. This past weekend, Laura, Bo and I went down to Deception Pass (Whidbey Island, Washington State) for four days (actually, I went early and Laura came later with friends - so I was there seven days). As has been the pattern over the last few months, the weather was unseasonably cold, but lucky for us very little rain. The State campground at Deception Pass was built in the days of tents and the odd tent trailer, so there are no services - so it was a stretch to keep the batteries alive for the five days I was "off the grid". In the summer it would have been easy, but at this time of year heat was mandatory at night and in the morning, so trying to limit furnace usage got Laura frustrated (the furnace could drain your batteries to nothing, overnight).

We had a great time despite the chilly weather, though. We went with the Rutherford's and the Chambers' from up the street, as well as the Wycherley's - I haven't seen Jim since 2006. The Cary's were supposed to come, but they are in a tent, and Lynn was sick already - sleeping on the ground would have guaranteed something nasty (flu, pneumonia, ebola).

Laura mentioned on the drive home that it was so nice to completely disconnect for a while - "no phones, no TV, no Internet" - I'd add "no power, no sewer, no water except what you haul". It does get me to thinking just how long you could really go without all those things (if it was warm, of course). Five days, ten, fifteen? Jim and his son talked about doing Burning Man next year - I'm not sure how serious they were, but if it turns out they are - count me in. Be a great "test" of self sufficiency.

All in all, we don't go "camping" anywhere near enough anymore - and when we do, we bring too much stuff with us (I'm a living example). All you really need are good friends, beer, marshmallows, and a fire.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

So that was the election - I think we need to rethink and reform it

Yesterday's election that swept a Conservative majority to power has caused me to think about true representational democracy. The kind that we think we already have, but really don't. Canada's election system came to be through a long and tumultuous process, but the last reform of any significance (and even that - advance voting criteria - wasn't that significant) was in the 1990's - long before the advent of modern social media and the proliferation of smart phones. The unrepresentative situation we find ourselves in now can be easily solved with simple technology - years ago I could imagine the vote counting would be onerous - and people couldn't and wouldn't wait weeks for the results of an election. Today, though, we can get a good understanding of the results - offered to you any which way you'd like - almost immediately after the polls close. Here's what we have today - post election:

  • Conservatives - 167 (54.2%) seats and 39.6% of popular vote
  • Liberals - 34 seats (11.0%) seats and 18.9% of popular vote
  • NDP - 102 (33.1%) seats and 30.6% of popular vote
  • Green - 1 seat (0.3%) seats and 3.9% of popular vote
  • Bloc - 4 (1.3%) seats and 6.0% of popular vote

If the seats were won with a proportion of the votes cast, here's how the Parliament would be arranged:

  • Conservatives - 122 seats (over-represented by 43 seats)
  • Liberals - 59 seats (under-represented by 25 seats)
  • NDP - 95 seats (over-represented by 7 seats)
  • Green - 13 seats (under-represented by 12 seats)
  • Bloc - 19 seats  (under-represented by 15 seats)

So here are the reasons to reform the voting in this country:

  • parties will get the number of seats they actually deserve
  • every vote actually counts - because seats are given in proportion to popular vote
  • the partie(s) that form the government will actually represent the majority of voters
  • the parties would represent all of us - men/women/right/left/rural/urban

There are a few methods of fair voting, listed here. Pick one, any one - it's better than we have now.